Showing posts with label Cinderella. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cinderella. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Fairy Tales: Modern Fairy Tales

Hello, Friends.

Sorry this is late! Today, we are talking about modern fairy tales. Fairy tales appear in many more places than we think, and archetypes can reduce pretty much anything to basic fairy tales.

However, our society still loves fairy tales, despite that they're centuries old. Disney's first movies were fairy tales, like Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, and Cinderella. Recently, live action versions of these movies have been made. Books have been based on fairy tales, or if not based on fairy tales, contain some hint of folklore. The Shadow Queen, by C.J. Redwine, the Lunar Chronicles, by Marissa Meyer, and Uprooted, by Naomi Novik are some of them. The Shadow Queen is a retelling of "Snow White," with a few embellishments and characterizations. Cinder, the first book in the Lunar Chronicles, is a retelling of "Cinderella," but set in the future, and although you can clearly see the story of "Cinderella" through the book, the fairy tale is twisted into something completely new. And Uprooted has hints here and there of fairy tales, but doesn't follow one specific tale.


Once Upon a Time is a TV show based on fairy tales. (My mom and sister watch it; I can't. It's too stressful. It's basically fairy tale soap-opera.) George Lucas claimed Star Wars was a modern fairy tale.

What are some modern fairy tales you like? Why?

Spruce Nogard

Saturday, April 8, 2017

Books: Fairy Tales: The Lure of Fairy Tales

Hello, Creatures.

What is it that we like fairy tales so much? Why do they draw us towards them so strongly? Why do we constantly recreate and reimagine fairy tales?

Is it because we like having stories to relate to? Is it because we wish for a place to escape, at least for a little while? Where did these stories come from? How many times have these tales been remade before they have reached our ears?

Because, you know, Disney's Beauty and the Beast wasn't the original tale. And out of the millions of versions of the Cinderella stories that exist, which was the first? How important is this really?

I believe that it's a vital part of our life and of fairy tales themselves to continually be recreated.

For, how else would we continue learning?

*On a side note, as I have been very excited about Disney's new Beauty and the Beast movie, I have kind of written very many posts on Beauty and the Beast. Here's a list:

Monday, January 30, 2017

Mental Library: Lenses: Feminism

Hello, Friends!

Today, we are starting a new series. I may still add to the postmodernism series, but, well, this is an exciting topic. I came across it as one of my ideas in my blog journal I had forgotten about.

Critical lenses are lenses literature can be viewed through. Lenses are kind of like putting on a pair of glasses, for example, a green-tinted pair of glasses would make everything look green, a pink pair of glasses would make everything look pink, and so on. Postmodernism is actually also a critical lens. Remember, also like a pair of glasses, just because we are analyzing a piece of literature through this lens does not mean that that is the main message of the book, or even that that is the correct (if there is a correct) interpretation of the book. Just like wearing green tinted glasses doesn't make everything actually green, it just makes everything look green, like Dorothy finds out. :)

The feminist critical lens looks for the balance of power and role of women, particularly highlighting the oppression of women. Many princess fairy tales can be viewed through this lens. Now, I'm not attacking fairy tales, or saying this is absolutely how they have to be seen all the time. This is just one way to look at them. For example, Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, and Cinderella are all rescued by men. They seemingly have no power to control their own destiny, and can only be saved by men. This is just a very simple feminist critique of these fairy tales. Someone posted an article on Twitter arguing why Cinderella shouldn't be seen like this, which. . .well, I can see both sides. Lands Uncharted first brought my attention to it. If you want to read it, click here. (BEWARE: Swearing is used in this article.)

On the other hand, Scarlet, the second book in the Lunar Chronicles, features Scarlet, an amazingly strong woman. Go read it. Analyzing Scarlet through the feminist lens portrays the main character to stand up for herself and not just let men come in and save her.

Another example of a woman saving a man is also in fairy tales. In many fairy tales, the woman has to somehow free her beloved. The most commonly known fairy tale of this is the "Frog Prince."

Try analyzing something through the feminist lens, then post about your experience in the comments!





Spruce Nogard
Attributions:
 

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Genre of the Month: Dystopian Fiction

Hello, Friends.

This month's genre is dystopian fiction. I do not like dystopian fiction, so I don't read it. Well, I guess you could call Cinder and the Lunar Chronicles dystopian fiction. . .

What dystopian fiction books do you like?

Spruce Nogard

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Books: Fairy Tales: Cinderella at the Theatre

Hello, Fairy Tale Characters!

I again am sorry about being late. However, please do realize that I have a life. :) Anyways, I'm going to set aside some time soon to do a ton of blog posts.

Today, I am talking about a production of Cinderella I saw recently. The play was brilliant, in so many ways.

First of all, the play was done in a particular style that incorporates modern references into the fairy tale.

I'm going to explain kind of how the play went, and then tell you some parts I really liked.

The opening scene is at a Victorian (?) Christmas party, where a grandfather is telling his granddaughter the story of Cinderella. Throughout the play, there are scenes with the carolers, the people at the party. They sing, dance, play games, and have contests. At one point, there is a tap-dancing contest between the carolers, which was wonderful to watch.

The actual Cinderella part was magnificent.

First of all, the stepsisters were played by men. This was supposed to be obvious, and funny. It was very hilarious. Second of all, the stepmother and stepsisters made many modern-day references, like references to the Vikings, Dunn Brothers, and Arby's. At one point, the stepmother started quoting A Christmas Carol, and her daughters had to tell her that was the wrong theatre. Also, the characters sang modern-day songs, like "Shut Up and Dance with Me." The prince sang modern-day love songs, as well.

They also made fun of and threw things at the pit orchestra. The pit was, of course, in a. . . hole? in the middle of the stage. The conductor was Canadian, so they made fun of him for that.

As well as all this, there was audience participation. The audience was asked questions, and had to cheer for Dorcas or Pearl (the stepsisters) at one point. . .etc.

At another point, a life-sized cow fell from the sky. . .

And I haven't even mentioned Bill yet. I am using the name "Bill" for privacy of the actual person as well as other reasons. Near the beginning of the play, the stepsisters went up to a random guy in the audience and asked his name. They then asked him if he was single, and proceeded to pretend they were in love with him the entire show. They put a camera facing him, and randomly throughout the play he appeared on the screens to each side of the stage. Once, he was on a kiss-cam, and the stepsisters kissed him, and another time, when Cinderella was locked in the closet and couldn't do her chores, they threw their laundry at him.

On the other hand, the sets were breathtaking. There was a set of the Stepmother's house, the enchanted garden, and the ballroom. The sets were, as someone we went with described it, "The closest I've come to seeing magic in real life."

The house set was actually. . . well, a house. They did not use the same main set and just change major props like they did if you saw the Beauty and the Beast play at the Chanhassen (although that was amazing, too). The sets actually changed. Cinderella's mice and bird friends were real, moving, speaking, creatures, but they were still a normal size. There was a fireplace with soup over it, many cupboards and a closet that opened.

The garden was the most magical set. The air was filled with fog over a frozen lake, while enchanted plants grew. In the background, reindeer actually grazed, wandering around in the trees. The fairy godmother enchanted the mice, who became mice footmen, and horses appeared. (These were played by people.) Then, the fairy godmother enchanted the pumpkin. It flew up, up, up, and out of sight. Then, a majestic carriage floated down, with intricate designs lacing every aspect of it.

The ballroom had a spiral staircase and a balcony, which people actually walked on. It had magnificent doors, and the dances performed were amazing.

I know it seems crazy that they could put all this in one play and not have it turn into a mess, but that's exactly what they did. 

Spruce Nogard

Attributions: